Close ad

Until 2009, Apple used a protection system (DRM) for content in iTunes, which allowed music to be played only on Apple players, i.e. iPods and later iPhones. Some protested this as an illegal monopoly, but those claims have now been swept off the table once and for all by a California appeals court. He decided that it was not an illegal activity.

The three-judge panel responded to a long-running class action lawsuit alleging that Apple acted illegally when it implemented a digital rights management (DRM) system for music in the iTunes Store. digital rights management) and the songs could not be played anywhere but on devices with the bitten apple logo. After the introduction of DRM in 2004, Apple controlled 99 percent of the market for digital music and music players.

However, the judge was not persuaded by this fact to rule that Apple violated the antitrust laws. They also took into account the fact that Apple kept the price of 99 cents per song even when DRM was introduced. And he did the same when he entered the market with his Amazon free music. The price of 99 cents per song then remained even after Apple removed DRM in 2009.

The court was also unpersuaded by the argument that Apple changed its software so that its devices could not play songs from, for example, the Real Network, which sold them for 49 cents.

So the debate over whether or not DRM was legal in the iTunes Store is definitely over. However, Apple now faces a much tougher lawsuit in the case price fixing of e-books.

Source: GigaOM.com
.