Close ad

Apple introduced wireless charging in its iPhones in 2017, when it was first included in the iPhone 8 and iPhone X models. Since then, it has equipped all its new phones with it. MagSafe then came with the iPhone 12 in 2020, and it's a shame we haven't moved on since then. Paradoxically, I also use wired charging with the wireless charger. 

Wireless charging is above all convenient, because you don't have to hit the connector in the port with it. All you have to do is place your iPhone in a designated place and charging is already underway. But it goes extremely slowly. With certified Made for MagSafe chargers 15 W, with non-certified only 7,5 W.

MagSafe is a simple technology that adds magnets around the charging coil to help the device sit better on the charger. This should also result in better charging efficiency, since there are not so many losses due to the precise setting. Of course, the secondary use is for various stands, when the charging iPhone doesn't just have to lie down, because the magnets will also keep it in a vertical position (even in the case of car holders). However, precisely because similar accessories are typically powered by a USB-C cable, there is a bit of a split in where to actually put the connector. This is my own experience based on using an iPhone 15 Pro Max with a USB-C port.

I have a third-party wireless charging stand in my office that is powered by the aforementioned USB-C cable and is not certified to charge the iPhone at 15W. So it pushes 4441W of power wirelessly into the iPhone 15 Pro Max's 7,5mAh battery , which is simply a half-day run. So I changed the meaning of the wireless charger to just a MagSafe stand. I connect the cable directly to the iPhone, which charges it in just a fraction of the time.

The absurdity of the situation 

Is it stupid? Absolutely, but it clearly points to the fact that wireless charging technology is limited, that is, at least with regard to the opening of the Qi standard, when even its 2nd generation will not help speed and performance. So yes, wireless charging, but it only makes sense to me on a bedside table, where you can charge your iPhone all night long. Even in the car, it pays to insert the cable directly into the iPhone instead of into the holder, as this will also reduce the heating of the device.

With iPhones, we take wireless charging for granted, but in the world of Android, it is only installed in the most equipped smartphones. In the case of Samsung, for example, only the Galaxy S and Z series, Ačka are not eligible. However, wireless charging can be even faster, when it easily exceeds 50 W, but these are already the own standards, especially of Chinese manufacturers (wired ones can already handle 200 W anyway). In the ordinary world, we still have to state that a wire is a wire and wireless charging is convenient, but inefficient and slow. Maybe that's why Apple came up with the Idle Mode feature in iOS 17, which can give wireless charging more meaning, although I haven't come up with a taste for it yet.

.