Anyone who has ever been interested in GTD (or any other form of time-management) on Mac and iOS has definitely come across the application Things. I've wanted to do a review of one of the most famous apps of its kind for a long time, but I'm finally coming up with it now. The reason is simple - Things finally offers (albeit still in beta) OTA sync.
It was precisely because of the lack of cloud data synchronization that users often complained to developers. Cultured Code kept promising that they were working diligently on OTA (over-the-air) sync, but when weeks of waiting turned into months and months into years, many people grew resentful of Things and switched to the competition. I too have tried many alternative programs for managing my tasks and projects, but none have suited me as well as Things.
There are indeed many applications designed to run GTD, however, in order for such an application to be successful these days, it should have a version for all possible and widespread platforms. For some, only the iPhone client may be enough, but in my opinion, we should be able to organize our tasks on a computer, or even on an iPad. Only then can this method be used to its full potential.
This would not be a problem with Things, there are versions for Mac, iPhone and iPad, although we have to dig deeper into our pockets to purchase them (the whole package costs about 1900 crowns). A comprehensive solution for all devices is rarely offered by the competition in such a form. One of them is similarly expensive OmniFocus, but which removed Things from one of its functions for a long time - synchronization.
This is because you need to work with such an application all the time and not to solve why you have different content on your iPhone than on your Mac, because you forgot to synchronize the device. The developers at Cultured Code have finally added cloud sync to Things after months of waiting, at least in beta, so those included in the testing program can try it out. I have to say that so far their solution works great and I can finally use Things 100%.
It makes no sense to describe applications for Mac and for iOS separately, because they work on the same principle, but understandably have a slightly different interface. The "Mac" one looks like this:
The menu – the navigation panel – is divided into four basic parts: Collecting (Collect), Concentration (Focus), Active projects a Places of fulfillment (Areas of Responsibilities).
inbox
In the first part we find inbox, which is the main inbox for all your new tasks. The Inbox primarily includes those tasks for which we do not yet know where to put them, or we do not have time to fill in the details, so we will return to them later. Of course, we can write down all the tasks in the Inbox and then browse and sort through it regularly in our free time or at a certain time.
Focus
When we divide tasks, they appear either in a folder Today, or Next. It is already clear from the name that in the first case we see the tasks that we have to do today, in the second we find a list of all the tasks that we have created in the system. For clarity, the list is sorted according to projects, we can then filter it further according to contexts (tags) or have only those tasks listed that have a time limit.
We can also create a task that will be repeated regularly, for example at the beginning of each month or at the end of each week. At the pre-set time, the given task is then always moved to the folder Today, so we no longer have to think about having to do something every Monday.
If we come across a task in the system that we can't do right away, but we think we might want to come back to at some point in the future, we put it in a folder Someday. We can also move entire projects into it, if necessary.
Projects
The next chapter is projects. We can think of a project as something we want to achieve, but it cannot be done in one step. Projects usually have several sub-tasks, which are necessary in order to be able to "tick off" the entire project as finished. For example, the "Christmas" project could be current, in which you can write down the gifts you want to buy and other things that need to be arranged, and when you've done everything, you can calmly cross off "Christmas".
Individual projects are displayed in the left panel for easier access, so you have an immediate overview of the current plans when looking into the application. You can not only name each project, but also assign a tag to it (then all subtasks fall under it), set a completion time, or add a note.
Areas of Responsibility
However, projects are not always sufficient for sorting our tasks. That's why we still have the so-called Areas of Responsibility, that is, areas of responsibility. We can imagine such an area as a continuous activity such as work or school obligations or personal obligations such as health. The difference with projects lies in the fact that we cannot "tick off" an area as finished, but on the contrary, entire projects can be inserted into it. In the Work area, you can have several projects that we have to do at work, which will allow us to achieve an even clearer organization.
Logbook
In the lower part of the left panel, there is also a Logbook folder, where all completed tasks are sorted by date. In the Things settings, you set how often you want to "clean" your database and you don't have to worry about anything anymore. An automated process (instantly, daily, weekly, monthly, or manually) ensures that you don't mix completed and uncompleted tasks in all your lists.
Inserting notes and tasks
For inserting new tasks, there is an elegant pop-up window in Things that you call up with a set keyboard shortcut, so you can quickly insert a task without having to be directly in the application. In this quick input, you can set all the essentials, but for example just write what the task is, save it to Inbox and return to it later. However, it is not just about text notes that can be assigned to tasks. Email messages, URL addresses and many other files can be inserted into notes using drag & drop. You don't have to look anywhere on the computer to have everything you need to complete the given task.
Things on iOS
As already mentioned, the application works on the same principle on both iPhone and iPad. The iOS version offers the same functions and graphical interface, and if you get used to the Mac application, Things on the iPhone will not be a problem for you.
On the iPad, Things take on a slightly different dimension, because unlike the iPhone, there is more space for everything and working with the application is even more convenient. The layout of the controls is the same as on the Mac – the navigation bar on the left, the tasks themselves on the right. This is the case if you use the iPad in landscape mode.
If you turn the tablet to portrait, you will "focus" exclusively on the tasks and move between individual lists using the menu Lists in the upper left corner.
Reviews
Things have been hurt for a long time (and may be for a while longer) by not having wireless sync. Because of her, I also left the application from Cultured Code for a while, but as soon as I got the opportunity to test the new cloud connection, I immediately returned. There are alternatives, but Things won me over with its simplicity and great graphical interface. I am completely satisfied with how the application works and what options it has. I don't need a more demanding Omnifocus solution to be satisfied, and if you're not one of those "demanding time managers" by all means, give Things a try. They help me every day and I did not regret spending a larger amount of money on them.
Nice review with lots of useful info. Considering the price and the impossibility of trying the application, I appreciate it. Thanks
Wunderlist is also pretty good and it's "free", that's probably the most important thing about it :)
But Wunderlist is not a GTD application, but an ordinary todo list. You can't compare these apps at all, each one is for a different target, which, as you quickly noticed, is also reflected in the price...
For some, the priority is not the price, but what the given application fulfills...
But the OTA is still accessible only to testers who have been allowed to do so by cultured code...
x-year development, a year and a half of beta testing that a normal person doesn't get to.
I don't know... the interface is great, but it's time to give up and go for omnifocus. Nowadays, the only way to synchronize is at home over Wi-Fi, only through an application installed on a Mac (i.e. iPad and iPhone cannot be synchronized even at home without a computer)...
epic fail in my opinion!
I fully agree that the Thing as such are successful, but the synchronization in its current form is truly a disaster.
I received an invitation to beta testing, but only for the Mac version, it cannot be synchronized with iOS via the cloud. (if one does not have this possibility to test). In addition, tasks from current Things cannot be transferred to the beta, so it is useless in practice.
I do not understand. OTA synchro has been in beta for many months and only for a select few. No matter how I look, nothing has changed. And maybe - as the author nicely writes - nothing will change for the next months and years. That's the problem with Things: a quick start, then a brake and zero communication with customers. There is no money for this.
A somewhat pointless article. Synchronization is in beta, but still unusable for most users who are not testers. How many more years do we have to wait?
honestly...Things is at least for me an example of a (apparently) lost investment...I have both an iPhone and a Mac version and I'd rather admit it was a bad investment and put money into Omnifocus (and just look at the CulturedCode forums for how many there are)
nowadays, one no longer invests in an application just for its immediate current functionality (even if it is possible), but should also take into account the development potential, or at least maintaining compatibility and removing bugs, if not adding features that may not be needed now, but in he would appreciate them in the future (GTD is, after all, a complex method that a person adapts over time, and that's where the robustness of the app comes in handy)
Things started off great, a great interface, just the right functionality...but for a good 2 years they have been standing still...OTA still unavailable, sub-tasks similar...Omnifocus is indeed more complex, but the entire Omnigroup has already proven several times that it is able to deliver adequate engineering quality (and that's about 3 more than Cultuired Code, but they are focused on 5 applications on Mac + the corresponding iOS versions)... they completed OmniPlan 2, and I believe that they will also complete OmniFocus 2 to full satisfaction...
although Mac is also about simplicity... sometimes it really pays to choose "engineering" apps... maybe more complicated, not so nice... but the interface reaches the desired level (especially on Mac) much easier... and the support/response of developers is usually quite better...that's why I currently prefer, among others, Bookends, Omnifocus and Devonthink over Papers, Things or iDocument
Hello. I received an invite from Cultured Code to the desktop version beta. However, I cannot start sync with things on the iPad and the iPhone - do I understand correctly that another separate invitation is needed for this? (I get things on my iPhone into the test version, but cloud sync cannot be started)..
Yeah, it is, huh? Nothing Cultured code does makes sense to me. Today, every new app supports cloud/icloud sync (like Wunderlist from the beginning). They refuse to CC iCloud. Reason? It would ONLY work between apple devices with iOS5 and Lion (in 100 years they will release a version for android and wp, beta in 50).
Who you need in the cloud, register for the beta and then ask them by email to support to invite you to the cloud. This afternoon was enough for me and it works, I wrote to them that I need a sync. Works great, great app!
I'm also in the cloud, it's been about a month since the invitation... I haven't pressed them in any way..