Close ad

Apple needs to produce so many new iPhones 6S and 6S Plus that it unusually left the production of the essential component – ​​the A9 processors, which it designs itself – to two companies. But as it turned out, the chips coming from Samsung factories are different from those from TSMC factories, and the latest tests indicated that the processors could be not only different in size, but also different in performance.

Different chips in the same iPhones she revealed dissection at the end of September chipworks. It was discovered that Apple uses processors with the same A6 designation in the iPhone 6S and 9S Plus, but some are manufactured by Samsung and some by TSMC.

Samsung manufactures components with 14nm technology, and compared to TSMC's 16nm, its A9 processors are ten percent smaller. As a rule, the smaller the production process, the lower the processor's demand on the battery, for example. However, the latest tests surprisingly reveal the exact opposite.

It appeared on Reddit several comparisons two identical iPhones, but one with a chip from Samsung, the other from TSMC. User raydizzle purchased two 6GB iPhone 64S Plus and used GeekBench for both devices tested. The result: the iPhone with the TSMC processor lasted almost 8 hours, the one with the Samsung chip lasted about 6 hours.

“I ran the test several times and the results were consistent. There was always a difference of about 2 hours. Both phones had the same backup, same settings. I also tried to factory reset both phones and the results were the same.” comments results raydizzle, who was surprised because he would have expected the smaller chip to be more energy efficient.

Apple did not comment on this fact when introducing the iPhones, nor later, when it came up. So it is not even clear which part of which company participates in the production of A9 processors. At least we have indicative results thanks to developer Hiraku Jiro, who created an app that can detect which processor you have in your iPhone 6S.

His CPUIdentifier is an unverified app that you can install at your own risk, however, it allows Jira to create graphs showing which chips are found in which iPhones. Currently, according to his data consisting of 60 thousand records (half iPhone 6S, half iPhone 6S Plus), the division of A9 chip production between Samsung and TSMC is practically half to half. For the iPhone 6S, however, Samsung supplies slightly more chips (58%), and for the larger iPhone 6S Plus, TSMC has the upper hand (69%).

You can also find out what processor is running in your iPhone via the Lirum Device Info Lite application, which can be found in the App Store and should not be potentially harmful to your device. Code under item Model manufacturer reveals: N66MAP or N71MAP means TSMC, N66AP or N71AP is Samsung.

Well-known tech YouTubers also conducted their own tests to reach similar conclusions as shown by GeekBench. Jonathan Morrison did a real-world test. He charged two identical iPhones to 100%, shot a video in 10K for 4 minutes and then exported it in iMovie. When he then ran a few more benchmarks, the iPhone with the TSMC chip had 62% battery, the iPhone with the Samsung chip at 55%.

A difference of eight percentage points might not be that big of a deal, but if he ran the same test again, the iPhone with the TSMC processor would score 24%, while the one with the Samsung component would score just 10%. This can be quite essential in practice. Similar the test was performed by Austin Evans and the iPhone with a TSMC chip actually lasted a bit longer.

[youtube id=”pXmIQJMDv68″ width=”620″ height=”360″]

At the time of purchase, the customer has no chance to discover which chip the new iPhone is buying with, and if the aforementioned tests were confirmed and the components from TSMC were indeed much more friendly to the battery, it could be a problem for Apple. Apple has not yet commented on the problem, and it will certainly be appropriate to wait for further, more detailed tests, which they promised, for example, in chipworks, but it is certainly a topic for discussion now. For the average user, the different efficiency of the chips may not be essential, but it can already play a role when using the iPhone 6S to the maximum. We have here #chipgate?

Source: Cult of Mac, 9to5Mac
Topics:
.