How to find out what slows down our computer and how to solve it effectively? Why do we see a rainbow wheel and how to get rid of it? What is the best diagnostic program for our Mac? If your Mac is really slow, it's best to run Activity Monitor and look at memory usage, CPU (processor) usage, and disk activity.
CPU, i.e. processor
First, let's look at the CPU tab. First, close all applications (using the CMD+Q keyboard shortcut). We start the Activity Monitor and let All Processes be displayed, we sort the display according to percentage load: then all processes should consume less than 5%, usually most processes are between 0 and 2% of processor power. If we look at idle processes and see mostly 95% and above, everything is fine. If the processor is loaded to tens or hundreds of percent, then you can easily find out the application by the name of the process in the upper part of the table. We can end that one. We let the "mds" and "mdworker" processes run, they are related to the indexing of the disk during backup, they will jump for a while, but after a while they will return to less than one percent. ¬When we have killed all applications, none of the processes should be using the CPU at more than 2% for more than 5-10 seconds except for the mentioned "mds" and "mdworker".
When the computer is subjectively slow even with a small processor load, we look at the computer's memory and disk.
System memory - RAM
If we see the green inscription Free memory in hundreds of megabytes, it is fine, if this number falls below 300 MB, it is the right time to replenish the memory or close some applications. If even with relatively free memory (and this does not happen) the Mac is slow, the last option remains.
Disk activity
Let's face it, Lion and Mountain Lion are optimized for use on SSDs in the MacBook Air and in the MacBook Pro with Retina display. With a healthy system, read and write data is around zero or those values jump between zero and in the order of kB/s. If the disk activity is still on average in the order of MB, for example 2 to 6 MB/sec., it means that one of the applications is reading from or writing to the disk. It is usually one of the processes with higher CPU usage. Apple has its applications very well optimized, so most often "third-party" applications behave like this greedily. So it's not our fault, but the fault of the developers of such a greedy app. We have three defense options:
– turn off when not in use
– do not use
– or not to install it at all
Deleting unnecessary files
The fact that we delete unnecessary files worked last on Windows 98. If a program creates its temporary files on the disk during installation or during its operation, it will most likely need them sooner or later. When we delete these "unnecessary" files, the program will create them again anyway, and our Mac will only slow down when creating them again. So we don't clean Mac (and preferably Windows) of unnecessary files, it's nonsense.
Programs that have Cleaner in their name and similar are just a trap for those who follow the lessons of the last millennium.
Disabling unused functions
So that's bullshit. Our computer has 4 GB of RAM and a two gigahertz processor. In normal computer use, 150 processes are running in the background at the same time, probably more. If we turn off 4 of them, we won't know. You can't help yourself by even one whole percentage of performance, if we have enough RAM, nothing will change. The video will export the same time and the game will show the same FPS. So we don't turn off anything on the Mac, we just add more RAM. This will significantly speed up switching between applications.
So how do you speed up your Mac? 4 GB of RAM? I'd rather have more
Mountain Lion manages less than 2 GB of RAM for basic work with the web and e-mails. So on older machines, if you add to 4GB, you can easily use iCloud on almost all Macs manufactured since 2007 with an Intel processor. And now seriously. If you want to have iPhoto (downloading photos from Fotostream) open all the time, Safari with ten tabs with Flash video, Photoshop or Paralells Deskotp, 8 GB of RAM is the minimum, and the 16 GB of RAM is quite a blast, you will use it. If, of course, the computer can use it.
How to REALLY speed up? Faster disk
The disk is the slowest part of our computer. She always was. The oldest MacBooks (white or black plastic) or aluminum use small disks. Smaller capacity 80, 160 to 320 GB drives are noticeably slower than the current 500-750 GB or any SSD. So if I mainly want to increase the capacity of my white MacBook, 500 GB for around 1500 CZK is an excellent choice. If we want to turn our favorite 4-year-old MacBook into a real cannon, we invest a few thousand in an SSD. For a price of around 4000 CZK, you can buy SSD disks, which noticeably speed up the entire computer. Attention, it will not increase performance, but it will increase the speed of starting applications and switching between applications. Together with 4 GB of RAM, we have a computer that can serve for the next few years, thanks to enough RAM and a fast disk, the computer behaves more quickly and we are not waiting for anything.
And how to speed up MacBook?
Practice has shown that a 4-5 year old MacBook with a Core 2 Duo processor from Intel still works, and the battery still offers several hours of work in the field. It follows that an investment of CZK 2000-6000 in a 2- to 4-year-old MacBook can help postpone the purchase of a new computer. Of course, it depends on the individual condition of the computer, but most of the MacBooks I've seen are beautiful, well-preserved pieces, where the one-time sum of around 5000 CZK is worth it.
And how to speed up iMac?
The iMac does not have screws on the back wall, so the only thing you can replace in it yourself is the RAM memory. There are faster 7200rpm drives in iMacs, but the reality is that you can definitely get some speedup by replacing the drive. To replace a disk in an iMac, you need to have enough information and certainly practice. If you do not have experience, it is better to entrust this operation to a service center or to someone who has done it before. There are video tutorials on Youtube on how to do it yourself, but if you make a mistake, you'll be looking for a broken cable for a few weeks. It's not worth it, experienced technicians will return your iMac with a new drive in a few days, and you don't have to waste time. I repeat: do not disassemble your iMac yourself. If you don't do it twice a week as a routine, don't even try. Cowards live longer.
Which disk to choose?
A mechanical one is cheaper, with a larger capacity you can also improve the speed of the disk. SSD is again more expensive, but the speed is usually several times compared to the original one. Today's SSD disks are no longer in their infancy and we can consider them a serious replacement for classic disks. Another advantage of SSD is lower energy consumption, but considering the total consumption of the computer, the difference is not significantly noticeable. If you choose a good SSD, the battery life can be extended by an hour, don't wait any longer. I didn't even notice the longer computer run thanks to the SSD in the MacBook Pro 17″.
Where's the hitch?
Let's start with the application. An application is a folder full of tiny kilobyte (kB) files scattered across many other folders. When we run the application, the system says: go to that file and load its contents. And in that content is another command: go to the other five files and load their content. If we searched for each of these six files for one second and fetched each of those files for another one second, then it would take (6×1)+(6×1)=12 seconds to load such six files. This is the case with a regular 5400 RPM mechanical disc. If we increase the rpm to 7200 per minute, we will find a file in less time and load it 30% faster, so our 6 files will be loaded by the faster disk in (6x0,7)+(6x0,7), that's it 4,2+4,2=8,4 seconds. This is true for a mechanical disk, but SSD technology has made searching for a file several times faster, let's say instead of the whole thing it will be one tenth of a second. Loading is also faster, instead of the 70 MB/s of mechanical disks, the SSD offers just 150 MB/s (for simplicity, we will calculate twice the speed, i.e. half the time). So if we factor in the reduced file search and load times, we get (6×0,1)+(6×0,5), i.e. 0,6+3, reducing the load time from 12 to just under 4 seconds. In reality, this means that larger programs like Photoshop, Aperture, Final Cut Pro, AfterEffects and others will start in 15 seconds instead of a minute, because they contain more small files inside, which the SSD can handle better. When using an SSD, we should really never see the rainbow wheel. When we catch a glimpse, something is wrong.
And how to speed up the graphics card?
No. The graphics card can only be replaced in the MacPro, which is almost no longer sold, and the new one has graphics that can handle three 4k displays, so there is nothing to replace. In iMac or MacBooks, the graphics chip is directly on the motherboard and cannot be replaced, even if you are very handy with solder, tin and rosin. Of course, there are professional graphics cards for professionals, but expect an investment of a few tens of thousands of crowns and it makes sense mainly for graphic and video studios, not for games. Of course, there are games for Mac, most of them work even on basic models, but the higher models of iMac or MacBook Pro have more powerful graphics for those users who demand performance. So one could answer that the performance of the graphics card can be increased only by replacing the computer with a higher model. And when the game jerks, I simply reduce the display of details.
And the software?
Software is another place to speed things up. But beware, this will not affect users, only programmers. Because programmers can optimize their software. Thanks to Activity Monitor, you can see how Apple's apps and others are doing. Versions for Mountain Lion are more or less fine, but three years ago, for example, Firefox or Skype in Snow Leopard used tens of percent of the computer during apparent inactivity. Perhaps those days are over.
Rainbow wheel
I click on a file or run an application. The computer shows a rainbow wheel and goes crazy on me. I hate the rainbow wheel. Crystal clear hatred. Anyone who has experienced the rainbow wheel on their Mac's display knows. A really frustrating experience. Let's try to explain the fact that there is no rainbow wheel on my computers, and you can see in the picture that I run over twenty applications with only 6 GB of RAM, while converting a video from MKV to MP4 using Handbrake, which uses the processor to full power. How is it possible to work on such a loaded computer without any problems? For two reasons. I have a good network set up and when I switched from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion I am installed Mountain Lion on a clean disk and the profile (only data without Applications) was imported into it from a Time Machine backup.
Rainbow wheel because of the network?
What? Sew? Is it like my wifi is bad? Yes, it is a relatively common source of problems. But not the Wi-Fi router as such, but rather its settings, or location, or even a combination of both. What effect does it have? The network card sends a challenge to the network, to which another device should respond. It is expected to take a while, so the time is set for the computer to wait. And until our network card hears from the device in question, so what? Yes. That's how the rainbow wheel spins. Sure, not always, but when I've dealt with this problem, in half the cases it was a different router (or cable connection) and in the other half it was a system reinstall.
Rainbow Wheel: Hubero kororo!
The aim of the article is to give hope to the owners of older models of iMacs and MacBooks that it is not unrealistic to use a computer that has been used for a few years again without the daily frustrating wiggling of the rainbow wheel and to use iCloud and other conveniences of the latest Mac OS X Mountain Lion. And once again for those in the back rows: no super program can replace an experienced person. If you don't dare or don't have the time, ask someone serious for help. Most service centers or Apple Authorized Resellers (APR stores) should be able to help or refer you to a certified professional.
Question to the author: How to back up a profile via Time Machine? I'm doing a full backup, so I don't know...
When migrating via the Migration application, only the profile data and not the applications with their settings can be retrieved.
Exactly, the "Data Transfer Wizard" (English Migration Assistant) is a tool that can "pick up" only the data we really want from a complete disk backup, or restore all of them, including applications and settings.
Just click on “Options” in the Time Machine settings. Use "+" to add folders that I don't want to back up. In my case, for example, Downloads, Movies and videos, I back them up manually to a network drive. The list of unbacked folders also automatically shows external drives and USB flash drives, which most often do not need to be backed up, as they are only used to transfer between already backed up drives.
I'll try to ask here because I don't have a working PC with Woknama at my disposal.
Is it possible to back up an SMB share on another Mac or PC via TM?
Through AFP, I reckon for sure.
A hook is enough for me ;-)
So the second time. The picture shows a screenshot of the Time Machine settings, after clicking on Options. The MAC disk (1) is fully backed up, this is the default state after turning on the TM. I have 185GB of data on my MAC drive, photos, documents, iTunes music and more.
I have DATA and PROJECTS disks (2) connected via USB, I have videos and projects that I am currently working on. They're usually on FireWire, but I'm using the cable elsewhere... Those drives aren't being backed up, so those are the drives in the window under the text "Exclude these items from backup:".
Network drives (3) cannot be backed up, as they are not on the backed up list and cannot be excluded either, TM in the iMac simply ignores them.
And finally, I would just like to add that backups can only be made to a local disk with journaling, that is, to a disk with FAT32 or another, backups do not work for technological reasons, not that Apple forbids it. And you can only back up to machines over the network, not to disks as such. In order for the TM in the iMac to know that there is a backup disk on the other side, the NAS or Time Capsule or WD MyBook Live and the like must respond to the requests of the TM from the iMac. This means that a shared drive from another Mac or from Windows cannot be used for backup. With some NAS drives, you go to the administration and turn on the Time Machine function, for example, with WD it is started from the factory, so it does not pose any resistance and anyone can make it work on a Mac.
I got quite used to flushing the memory several times a day with the purge command through the terminal. while working, even 8GB of memory can be filled without any problems. the IDE, versioning system, mail.app, a couple of bookmarks in chrome and cached songs on soundcloud will be launched. but that is also a blind view of the matter. to wait for a beach ball even when the memory is full or to observe some larger system responses, fortunately not yet :)
Demagoguery and "controversy" at any cost, huh? The fact that you can significantly speed up the book by replacing the disk with an SSD, or by upgrading 2 GB to 8-16 GB of RAM is nothing new. Likewise, the fact that if I restore a completely messed-up system from TM during a new OSX installation, it will be messed up again :) The last words and paragraphs are supposed to be revealing and controversial, but they don't have to be XNUMX% true. Turning off unused functions and keeping the system clean, or cleaning it, is a commendable activity. Of course, a person has to decide which cache to delete and should not be surprised that when he deletes the cache of indexed files, it is indexed again and the machine is currently occupied by this end. :) howgh.
I'm surprised that kernel_task only eats 496MB on the screen - I have over 1,2GB and I have no idea how to reduce it (MBP 2012 - Fusion (HDD/SSD) + 8GB RAM), can anyone help?
Sorry, but I haven't seen the rainbow wheel since 10.2. I don't know what it is about...
I didn't know that you with apple computers also have our windows problems :) FYI – I've never owned a mac
When MS stole the OS from Apple, they took it all together with bugs and added a few more as added value :-)
I have an iMac (2012) and have never had a speed problem. I saw the rainbow wheel maybe only for 2 seconds at system startup.
I'll admit, I've never had a serious problem with speed, if I don't count some third-party apps. But my personal problem is more with the heating of the MacBook Pro (mid 2009). I would rather need help with that, because it can heat me up to over 90°C during simple activities. At the service, they told me that nothing is wrong, that the maximum load temperature of the Core2Duo is 105ˇC. But if it was only under load, I would understand, but this happens at any time. What about that please?
Just open the MacBook and remove dust from both fans, etc. If you have never cleaned it, this is most likely the reason why your MacBook Pro heats up. So cleaning should help. Although they would probably do it in the service...
I have an older Macbook from the same year at home, also a Core2Duo, and I thought that it heats up a lot and is noisy even during relatively simple operations. I took it completely apart, cleaned it, took out the processor, removed the old thermal paste, polished it and applied a new layer of quality thermal paste. I have to say it helped 500%. The Macbook doesn't heat up, it's beautifully quiet, you can only hear it during an export or a longer, demanding operation. Purely subjectively, I feel that the Macbook behaves better than from the factory. But I think this applies to all computers from the factory or boxed coolers.
If you have a lot of files on your desktop, you can't move the wheel. All you have to do is put them in folders. They can still stay on the table and the wheel will disappear :)
I would just add that having files on the desktop is a "killer house". The more full the desktop (mainly large files), the slower the system. It is ideal to have only representatives of folders on the desktop that are stored somewhere on the disk, but certainly not 10 movies on the desktop, then the system keeps "crunching" the desktop and the whole thing is stuck. This is especially noticeable if you have a rotating disc. It's not noticeable with SSD.
note on the paragraph "System memory - RAM".
The author can see there that he has less than 100MB free. Anyone who knows a little bit about UNIX-based operating systems sees more than 2,7GB free.
I recommend studying memory management in Unix ;)
Sure, you're right, but I took the value from experience when the system starts swapping to disk and some operations slow down.
So I see this a lot with my Mac Mini 2012 quad core. I know it's because of low RAM (original 4GB), but there's no money left for such an upgrade. Coupled with a 5400-rpm disc, it sometimes behaves like a slug.
SMB is a resource that knows the appropriate rights to that share and reports in the Finder.
The target is, for example, a TC or a local TM USB HDD.
If it is physically on the internal disk, TM backs it up. If it's a mounted external drive, it's a network drive and TM will ignore it. I hope I answered…
maybe you noticed it too, but do you think the imac has something like a "moving beat"? sometimes I have 150% usage on the activity monitor and I noticed that it is also in the picture, what do you think it is??
No way, it's just a conversion to individual CPU cores. When I load one core to 100%, the Activity Monitor shows 100%. Handbrake in the picture is deliberately converting the video, it used two cores almost to the full, that's why it shows 188% for one application, the remaining 12% is shared by other applications and the system.
So if I had a 12-core Mac Pro, and I let it convert video, then the system meter would show 12 cores plus 12 pseudo-cores from Multithreading, so MA would show, for example, 2200% for the video converter, and 200% would be left for the system and other applications. And anyway, a 4-core i5 processor (Quadrocore) CPU that has Multithreading behaves like an 8-core one, as I write in the article about Mac Pro: http://jablickar.cz/legenda-jmenem-mac-pro/, then the meter would show 800%, but the application usually loads it to 600-700%, for the reasons mentioned in the text.
So calm down, no one is lying to us, it's just a way of measuring :-)