Four years. It took four years for Microsoft to brought its Office suite to the iPad. After long delays and efforts to make Office a competitive advantage for Surface and other tablets with Windows RT, Redmond decided that it would be better to finally release the ready-made Office, which had probably been lying in an imaginary drawer for months. The company's current CEO, who probably understands the essence of Microsoft software better than Steve Ballmer, certainly played a part in this.
Finally, we have the long-awaited Office, the holy trinity of Word, Excel and PowerPoint. The tablet version of Office has really hit the ground running, and Microsoft has done a great job of creating a touch-friendly office suite. In fact, it did a better job than the Windows RT version. All of this seems like reason to be happy, but is there anyone to be happy today except a minority group of corporate users?
Due to the late release of Office, users were forced to look for alternatives. There were quite a few of them. With the first iPad, Apple launched a tablet version of its alternative office suite, iWork, and third-party developers were not left behind. QuickOffice, now owned by Google, probably caught on the most. Another interesting alternative is its Drive directly from Google, which offers not only a relatively capable cloud office package with mobile clients, but also an unprecedented opportunity to collaborate on documents.
Microsoft itself forced the user to escape to alternatives with its bad strategy, and now it is trying to make up for its losses by releasing a version of Office for iPad at a time when more and more people are discovering that they don't actually need an expensive package for life and can get by with other software either for free or for significantly lower costs. Not that Office as such is bad. It is a very robust software with a number of functions and in a way the gold standard in the corporate sphere. But a large part of users can only do with basic formatting, simple tables and simple presentations.
From my point of view, Office is not my cup of tea either. I prefer to write articles Ulysses 3 with Markdown support, however, there are times when other applications, such as iWork, cannot completely replace Office. At the moment when I need to make an analysis from the available numbers and estimate future trends, work with a script for translation or use experienced macros, there is no other option than to reach for Office. That's why Microsoft software won't just disappear from my Mac. But what about the iPad?
[do action=”quotation”]There are more than enough alternatives here, and each of them means the departure of customers from Microsoft.[/do]
Office on the tablet requires an annual fee of CZK 2000 for editing and creating documents. For that price, you get a bundle on all available platforms for up to five devices. But when you already own Office for Mac without a subscription, is it worth the extra 2000 crowns to sporadically edit Office documents on a tablet when you can always do more comfortable work on a laptop?
Office 365 will definitely find its customers, especially in the corporate sphere. But those for whom Office on the iPad is really important probably already have a prepaid service. So Office for iPad may not attract many new customers. Personally, I would consider buying Office for the iPad if it was a paid application, at least for a one-time price of $10-15. As part of the subscription, however, I would overpay several times due to really occasional use.
A subscription model similar to Adobe and Creative Cloud is undoubtedly attractive to companies because it eliminates piracy and ensures regular income. Microsoft is also moving towards this lucrative model with its Office 365. The question is whether, apart from traditional corporate customers dependent on Office, anyone will be interested in such software, even though it is undoubtedly of high quality. There are more than enough alternatives, and each of them means customers leaving Microsoft.
Office came to the iPad with a huge delay and quite possibly helped people figure out that they could actually do without it. He came at a time when his relevance is rapidly fading. The tablet version of the exodus won't change users too much, rather it will ease the pain of those who have been waiting for it for years.
Exactly as written in the article. I waited and switched to iWork this January. I found that everything I need is in the office suite from Apple. Syncing via iCloud works flawlessly and I can work on the iPad and then finish the work on the Mac. Microsoft let me down with its policy of no rush for both Apple OS and iOS. Furthermore, the Adobe payment system is a waste of money for me due to the non-returnable investment of annual payments. iWork suits me perfectly and I won't change anything. The new version of Office for Mac will definitely also be free in the App Store, but only with the payment of Office 365 and that is also useless.
That's right, Office for iPad is free but it can only open documents, if you want to edit then for 99 USD a year is a total mockery and let me keep it.
I think the pricing policy is fine. You forget what you get for the given price: 5 PC/Mac licenses + 5 tablet licenses + 20 GB OneDrive (27 GB in total) + Skype minutes. If I were to compare iCloud 30 GB for 42 euros a year and that, unlike One Drive, is quite limited in use. Ideal for a family. Cheaper tariffs are to come for individuals. And finally, comparing ms office and iwork is like comparing photoshop and gimp. Most people have stolen photoshop at home, but gimp would be enough for them - which is probably the reason why adobe switched to a subscription model.
fine, but what good will 5 pc/mac licenses do for me? what will 5 tablet licenses do for me? Honestly, a normal person has 1 computer, at most 1 work computer and that is mostly Windows with MS Office included, a normal person has 1 iPad, 1 iPhone, why pay for 5 licenses? total nonsense
and you can't agree with your friends? or do you live apart without friends? This is how I deal with practically every software. 1 license for me, 1 license for my wife, 1 license for my uncle, and I will find someone who will pay a fair share for any additional licenses.
When I'm not a license dealer. I am a very normal user. So I won't go around relatives or neighbors. And I consider this, especially for Excel, to be fantastic software, but I also consider the licensing policy of MS to be a misdemeanor.
Later, they should introduce Office personnel, where there should be only 2 licenses, but it is not so profitable... http://www.lupa.cz/clanky/microsoft-chysta-office-365-personal-levnejsi-variantu-pro-jednotlivce/
I don't want 5 licenses. I want one on Mac and one on iPad. What is it for? Why should I pay for 5 licenses in advance and we are talking about an ANNUAL subscription fee? I don't need Skype and 5Gb is enough for iCloud. What's wrong with that?
I would like the margin on the iPad to be no more than 50%. To have standard usb and central storage. So that Apple doesn't rob me of 30% on every app... well, Steve replied that if I don't like it, then don't buy an ipad. The good thing is that you don't have to buy it. Otherwise, an individual subscription should be available in the spring for about $70 a year.
He answered you correctly and we won't buy it (Office) either. I won't give them $70 for it either, and there's no reason why. If Apple is robbing you of 30%, try to sell it yourself or elsewhere. Then compare it.
I don't know, but I don't have GIMP or Photoshop (full-face) on my Mac. I bought Pixelmator and Photoshop Express (which I hardly ever turn on, because Pixelmator is enough). I think quite a lot about buying applications and I have no problem paying enough money for quality software at once. But the subscription concept doesn't suit me with SW. "Software as a service/Product as a service" is a trend these days, but I'd rather pay a few liters once every X years for a license that will work "as long as I need" (I can skip one refresh cycle) than pay a subscription, which works out the same as buying boxed SW with every cycle. It may be different for a company.
I haven't even read it yet and I will immediately write: NO IT DOESN'T MATTER. It's too late and MS has fallen asleep again. They obviously don't realize it with the price they put for use. Apple users mostly don't need them anymore, and the others will be taken over by Google for a while.
As an iPad user, which I use as a substitute for school notebooks, I have used Pages until now. And to be honest, Pages on the iPad are quite unfinished... The main problem is that when I mark some text, they get bitten... And there's more... So as soon as they updated OneNote, I started using it and I'm extremely satisfied :)
Pages don't work for me.
Unfortunately for me, yes... As I wrote, when I write running text and mark it and want to format it, it bites... The biggest paradox is that it happens on an A7... On an iPad mini with Retina.
But the lady in the photo looks pretty ;-)
The lady in the photo looks like a guy. Ugly guy :-)
Just bullshit :-D. Oh the carrot soft.
If you use iWork for your needs, then OK.
However, if you need to communicate with the environment, then unfortunately I have bad luck with iWorks. I don't know anyone who doesn't use Office or rather uses iWork. The conversion to Word is pretty lousy, similar to Numbers. Keynote is the best.
Office 365 is not cheap, but annual licenses for 5x PC/Mac and other mobile devices are not so bad.
Personal needs will probably be covered by the future Personal version.
I appreciate it and I finally have quality Office on the iPad, because no alternative application can replace Office.
It's true that the compatibility is still worth a fart. If they did, Office would be laughed at. The most used functions would be enough.
I totally agree with the article. Put Office for $15 on one device, so I'm still fighting for it...
I'm offering Microsoft $10 per app, no more. Why don't I give like $15? I can't even print the documents from it, so why? And I won't even give $100 a year. For what on earth? For 5 licenses on PC/Mac? Any other storage? But I want one mobile app here, I don't need more. I already have Office at home and at work, and I don't need the 365 version there. I already have storage on Dropbox, Box and I don't know where else. It's like if I were to buy a pool for my garden, the contractor would want 2 mega for it and would be surprised - But you also have a water slide, waves and a beach for up to 100 people - does that seem like a lot of money to you? Yeah, that's enough money for me and I just don't need all that extra stuff.
I'm willing to pay $10 for an app that I'll buy and use for as long as I want, not just a year.
The subscription doesn't suit me at all, as has already been said several times in the comments, I'll pay the $15 once, but $100 every year? Phe, not by chance. And piracy? It is minimal on iOS. Fortunately, I'm happy with iWork and wouldn't change a thing about it.