Close ad

When the first iPhone was launched, iOS, then iPhone OS, could do almost nothing. With pre-installed apps, it handled basic things like calling, texting, handling emails, writing notes, playing music, browsing the web and… that's pretty much it. Over time, the App Store, MMS, Compass, copy and paste, multitasking, Game Center, iCloud and more and more features.

Unfortunately, as it happens, man is an eternally dissatisfied creature, and therefore even iOS will never be a perfect system. What could move it an imaginary rung higher?

Fast access to WiFi, 3G…

A deficiency that has traditionally been talked about every year – the need to go to the settings and its items. I'd be very skeptical here, because if Apple hasn't changed its approach in the last five years, it won't now. And honestly, he has no reason to. Almost everyone has Wi-Fi switched on all the time. Next – bluetooth. Those who use it often have no reason to turn it off at all. On the other hand, users who rarely turn on the blue tooth will not lose their finger after three taps on the display. What Apple could do, however, is group WiFi, Bluetooth, turn on cellular, and 3G (or LTE) into one item in Settings. The question remains whether quick access to these items is really necessary. On the other hand, the notification bar is largely unused, it could certainly find a place here.

Widgets

Well, yes, we can't forget them. Everyone wants them, yet Apple continues to ignore these widgets. If we look at this issue from the point of view of the apple company, everything will be revealed by itself - inconsistency. It is simply not possible to allow anyone to create an element that will be part of the system and could disrupt its specific user interface. Similar atrocities could then arise as in the Android OS. Everyone simply does not have an artistic sense, so it is better for these people to prohibit graphic interventions in the system. Two clocks on one screen, inappropriate font or messy layout - do we really want something similar to the two following images?

The second direction, which appears to be more realistic, could be the creation of a new section in the App Store. Widgets would go through an approval process similar to apps, but there is one big catch but by. While apps can be rejected based on violating some of the terms, how do you reject an ugly widget? All that remains is to determine what form the widgets should have. If Apple would eventually allow them, it would probably create some kind of templates or API to make the integration of widgets into the system as little noticeable as possible. Or will Apple stick with its two Weather and Action widgets in the notification bar? Or is there another way?

Dynamic icons

The home screen hasn't changed much in its five years of existence. Yes, a few layers have been added in the form of folders, multitasking, notification center shutter and wallpaper under the icons, but that's all. The screen still consists of a matrix of static icons (and possibly red badges above them) that do nothing but wait for our finger to tap and then launch the given application. Couldn't icons be used more effectively than just as application shortcuts? Windows Phone 7 may be a bit further ahead than iOS in this aspect. The tiles display all kinds of information, so these tiles perform two tasks at once - icons and widgets. I'm not saying that iOS should look like Windows Phone 7, but to do something similar in an original "Apple" way. For example, why can't the Weather icon show the current status and temperature when the Calendar can show the date? There is certainly a way to improve the home screen, and the iPad's 9,7″ display in particular encourages it.

Central storage

Sharing files via iTunes just isn't "cool" anymore, especially if you need to manage multiple iDevices at once. Many would certainly solve this problem through mass storage, but we all know very well that Apple will never unlock the directory structure of iOS. On the contrary, Apple is slowly but surely deciding on a cloud solution. More and more apps are able to store their data and files in iCloud, which certainly makes sharing them between devices more convenient. Unfortunately, a kind of sandboxing works here too, and what one application has saved in the cloud, the other can no longer see. From the point of view of data protection, this is of course fine, but I would still like to open the same PDF or other document in multiple applications without duplicating or using another storage (Dropbox, Box.net,... ). The people of Cupertino could certainly work on this, and I believe they will. iCloud is still in its infancy and we will see its expansion and maximum use of potential only in the coming years. It all depends on the speed, reliability and stability of the data connection.

AirDrop

File transfer is also related to the AirDrop function, which made its debut with the arrival of OS X Lion. This is a very simple and intuitive way to copy files between Macs on a local network directly in the Finder. Couldn't something similar be invented for iDevices? At least for images, PDFs, MP4s, iWork documents, and other file types that are opened by Apple-made apps anyway on iOS. At the same time, it would be an alternative for users who do not like to entrust their data to remote servers.

multitasking

No, we're not going to talk about the functionality of a principles of multitasking in iOS. We will discuss the way users are allowed to manipulate running applications. We all know the routine of how to “launch” an app that doesn’t get stuck for any reason – press the home button twice, or on the iPad, drag 4-5 fingers upwards, hold your finger on the icon and then tap on the red minus badge. Tiring! Couldn't the application simply be closed by simply dragging it out of the multitasking bar? It certainly worked, but again, it has its advantages but by in the name of inconsistency. It is necessary to put yourself in the shoes of a less technically proficient user who is used to uninstalling applications using that shaking and tapping on minus. A different way of handling the icons could confuse him.

Likewise, it is difficult to implement a different way of managing running applications on the iPad. Users are used to a simple bar below the display from their iPhones and iPod touch, so any change could easily confuse them. While the iPad's large screen directly appeals to Mission Control, it's hard to say whether such a relatively advanced feature is needed on a consumer device. Apple keeps its iDevices as simple as possible.

Facebook integration

We live in an information age where social networks have become an integral part of a large percentage of the population. Of course, Apple is also aware of this, which is why it integrated Twitter into iOS 5. But there is one more, much bigger player in the world - Facebook. Current information suggests that Facebook could be part of iOS as early as version 5.1. Even Tim Cook himself, who created this network, raised expectations marked as "friend", with which Apple should cooperate more.

Automatic updates

Over time, each of us has collected dozens of applications, which logically implies that an update of one of them comes out almost every day. Not a day goes by that iOS doesn't notify me of available updates with a number (often two digits) in the badge above the App Store. It's certainly good to know that newer versions of installed apps have been released and that he should download them, but couldn't the system do it for me? It would certainly not hurt to have an item in the settings where the user would choose, here the updates will be downloaded automatically or manually.

What else could Apple improve?

  • allow multiple icons to be moved at once
  • add buttons Share in the App Store
  • allow copying the link and description text in the App Store
  • add sync of Safari panes via iCloud
  • create an API for Siri
  • fine-tune the Notification Center and its bar
  • enable basic math calculations in Spotlight as in OS X
  • allow changing default apps (unlikely)

What new features would you like? Write to us here under the article or in the comments on social networks.

.