Close ad

It has practically become a cliché that you could bet on before every Apple keynote. It is almost certain that the new device presented by the Californian company will be thinner than its predecessor. This was not the case with the new ones either iPhone 6 a 6 Plus. But who do they benefit?

We've heard that line so many times. 2010: "iPhone 4 is thinner." 2012: "iPhone 5 is thinner." And now 2014: "iPhone 6 is thinner again, the thinnest ever."

Apple has been chasing for years to hopefully introduce a paper-thin iPhone. At least it seems that way. Of course, the development since the first iPhone in 2007 was logical and reducing the thickness of the phone's chassis made sense. Apple was still looking for loopholes where it could reduce the size of one or the other component in order to assemble them all "under the hood" as economically as possible.

In 2012, he came up with the iPhone 5, which had a very similar appearance to the previous iPhone 4/4S, but within two years, Apple managed to reduce the thickness of its phone by a respectable 1,7 millimeters. But already with the iPhone 5, complaints about the device being too thick practically did not appear, and with the iPhone XNUMX, many users even began to wonder if the new model was too thin.

It's often a matter of habit, but having the narrowest possible device really isn't always the best solution. If you cut the phone out of cardboard, its thickness, perhaps better said thinness, will not hold as well as the more honest iPhone 5C with rounded edges that fit exactly in your hand. Although the even thinner iPhone 5 was a technological step forward, the vast majority of customers would not mind if the dimensions on one of the three axes remained unchanged.

But we are not only dealing with the thickness of the phone here. Everything has deeper connections with other features of the device, which are much more important than the fact that the latest iPhone is a millimeter thinner or two tenths of a millimeter thicker. Before the introduction of the iPhone 6, I wondered whether Apple would once again go after millimeters, or whether rationality would prevail in its offices and come to the conclusion that the new iPhone might not necessarily be the thinnest in history.

Unfortunately, Apple did not surprise. When introducing the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, Phil Schiller could once again pull out the already-learned slogan that these are the thinnest iPhones we've ever seen. By another seven tenths or five tenths of a millimeter. On paper, these are minor changes, but we can be sure that we will feel this change again in the hand, and it remains to be seen whether, together with the rounded edges of the new iPhones, an even thinner body will be beneficial to the cause.

[do action=”quote”]No one would blame Apple when the iPhone 6 was as thick/thin as the iPhone 5S.[/do]

But that is not primarily the problem with the constant thinning of iPhones. We may have to hold the iPhone six - also thanks to larger displays - a little differently, but it won't be a significant problem. However, Apple could have taken a different approach to the new generation of its smartphone. No one would blame him if the iPhone 6 was as thick/thin as the iPhone 5/5S. After all, 7,6 millimeters was already a respectably low dimension in the world of smartphones.

With the advent of new technologies and, above all, large displays, Apple would then have the perfect opportunity to get a larger battery into the iPhone. A smaller processor and a display seven-tenths of an inch larger in the case of the iPhone 6 would provide up to 15 cubic centimeters more space, which could be filled by a battery with a much larger capacity ensuring a significantly higher endurance of the iPhone, which is currently one of its biggest weaknesses. It should be noted that it is not only the Apple device that is dealing with it, but also the competition.

However, Apple decided not to take advantage of this great opportunity and preferred to bet everything on the perhaps magical word "thinner". The added space suddenly shrunk by roughly half, and since the larger display needs much more energy, the endurance of the new iPhone 6 practically does not differ from previous models, which is a huge disappointment. For the iPhone 6 Plus, the numbers are somewhat more positive, but still rather weak.

Moreover, another such major iPhone downsizing seems incomprehensible when we look at the back of the new phones. The camera lens protrudes from the back of the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, apparently due to the fact that Apple could not completely fit it into such a thin body without preserving all the upcoming technologies. If that's really the reason, it's absurd that Apple didn't either stick with the same thickness or change it by just a few tenths of a millimeter if they really wanted to use that thin iPhone thing.

In addition, the new iPhone could apparently also be waterproof, because Apple reportedly rejected such an option due to the fact that it would have to make the iPhone thicker. Who among you wouldn't mind having an iPhone 6 that is seven tenths of a millimeter thicker, but knowing that nothing will happen to it if it accidentally meets water, and at the same time it will last you all day and thanks to this, it will not terminate its service even when you want it to with Apple Pay use as a payment card?

.