Philip Houska The unveiling of the new iPhone is apparently only a few weeks away. This helps to spread various speculations about how the new model could look and what it will hide inside. The new iPhone is supposed to have a dual camera system, redesigned antennas, it will lose the 3,5 mm jack and, according to the latest reports, also a completely new Home button, the main control button of the entire phone.
According to Mark Gurman of Bloomberg and its traditionally very solid resources, the new iPhone will have a Home button that will provide users with a vibrating haptic response instead of a traditional physical click. It should work on a similar basis to the trackpad on the latest MacBooks.
Apart from this news Bloomberg it also states that the iPhone 7 will not have a 3,5mm jack, which has been heavily rumored for a few months, and will be replaced by an additional speaker. He also confirmed that the Plus variant will have a dual camera that should ensure even better photos.
That makes sense.. Removing the most disruptive component.. Personally, I'm curious about those speakers, the current generation is not very good.. They could take inspiration from the ipad pro and add them to the top of the device as well.. It would definitely be beneficial
Because that's exactly what the PHONE is for. To put him on a chair at a party and let him win some stupid playlist.
It's a phone. In addition, it would take up space for the battery and shorten its lifespan.
A moron. One speaker on the soft listening is az az. In the age of airplay and all kinds of gadgets, what you wrote is complete bullshit.
? exactly, in no time people will want him to wash, iron, clean their PHONE and ouch…. ?
Why would it be crap? Personally, I often watch videos or listen to music from my phone when I'm walking around the house or in the garden, and I would like better quality reproduction. And I don't want to constantly drag the speaker around with me. The speaker does not take up that much space and there is a lot of room for improvement. Especially if we look at the competition in the form of htc. I don't accept the style argument of a phone is not a speaker... Yes, it's not the same as a camera and I didn't notice that anyone complained when Apple improved the camera...
You don't think it's important to listen to music on the phone, do you? Not even teenagers do that for God's sake!!!
I don't understand, I just come across something on the wall that I want to play, so I play it... I know a lot of people who do this tsk and they're not teenagers... I don't see a single reason why I should pair the speaker every time I want to play something, check if it's charged and pull it with you..
and because of that, for a maximum of several minutes of video on your FB wall, you need to load another 3 repraks into the iPhone.
God, please stop writing such nonsense here. you are here for laughs
I just wrote an opinion about what innovation I would welcome and why.. Your argument is like in the discussions when the mpx increase from 5 to 8 in ip4S was leaked and a bunch of people cursed that there is no point in phone photos.. As you can see, it is. It can also be seen that you have no experience with a phone with stereo speakers.. If you had, you would know that it is a very convenient thing. In short, the iPhone is one of the most expensive phones on the market (if I don't count vertu and similar models), so I see no reason why it can't have what the competition has had for generations.
"The iPhone is simply one of the most expensive phones on the market (if I don't count
vertu and similar models) so I see no reason why he couldn't have what he has
competition for generations."
– And in that I agree with you and at the same time I ask: "Then why the hell doesn't he have those things yet?"
Well, because "Think different."
PS: This is in no way a defense of this slogan. In my opinion, it changed its meaning a long time ago! :O)
Unfortunately, there are always plenty of "fans and experts" who are willing to argue to the bone that the absence of a given technology is actually an advantage...
you are comparing completely incomparably. while the camera largely replaces the camera as such and the speakers, and there will be more of them, in the latter case they cannot replace classic boxes and they will be of lesser or higher quality.
even so, it's all round. if you want ultra high-quality photos, buy a SLR. if mobile photos are enough for you and you don't want to carry a SLR camera with 4 lenses, then what's in the iPhone is enough for you.
and it's the same with music. if you want a quality reproduction, buy some Mark Levinson boxes for a mega pool and you'll have no more problems. but for those short Facebook videos that don't have any good sound as such, stereo speakers won't improve it either.
and if you listen to music from a mobile phone, you don't care if the speaker will be one or there will be 9 of them. You just made a stink, which is not about quality reproduction. that's not Apple's philosophy. I want to have everything at a high level. and unfortunately, you can't get a high-level sound from any such micro rework.
I guess we misunderstood each other. The main idea of what I am saying is that, of course, such a high-quality speaker cannot be stuffed into the body of the phone to replace real speakers. The phone itself is sometimes difficult to compensate for an SLR, it is simply not physically possible for it to acquire similar properties. I'm just saying that apple could catch up with the competition and build stereo speakers into the phone, which are miles better than the current solution. And I say that for many people it could replace even cheap bluetooth speakers up to approx. 800,-.
I also think there is a huge difference in playing anything on an iPad with a mono speaker and an iPad Pro which already has better stereo speakers. The same when I compare my phone, which has an extremely high quality audio output, but still mono, with the Xperia Z5 Premium. Although the Xperia is not that loud, the stereo effect is clearly a nice step forward and when playing a video on YT, you can tell the difference in favor of the stereo speaker. Owners of the new Idol4S/BlackBerry/VDF Smart Platinum, or whatever brand the same phone from TCL is sold under, say the same thing, I haven't heard the Chinese myself, so I can't compare.
Sure, but the increase in MPx only happened at a time when the chips really showed a meaningful improvement, at least a little, and it is still rather questionable. Yes, the photo has more MPx, but it doesn't have more details even if you put it on your head (8MPx vs 12MPx). The main thing is that the photo has more MB. I understand your comfort with music, but on the other hand, you have to realize that with the number of speakers the consumption will go up, and here too you need to watch the charge. And even here there is already a better variant of BT headphones.
This is what I said in some of the older posts, the iPhone 6/6S camera didn't do so well. Although the sensor received a higher resolution (8->12 MPix, 50% shift), Apple ordered a lens with a similar design to that used in generations with a significantly lower resolution. The lens consisted of five lenses, while the potential for correction of optical defects is determined (apart from materials and grinding methods) precisely by the number of surfaces. While the competition went further in this direction, Apple only changed the sensor under the same design lens, which turned out as expected: tests showed that after adjusting the output of the new and old generations to the same resolution, the level of detail in the image is practically identical, in other words the placement of a 12 MPix sensor only brought a better parameter in the paper specifications, not an adequately detailed drawing. The artwork remained at a similar level to the previous generation - good, but far from the best. http://goo.gl/iwngjx
I would rather say that small sensors are simply not capable of more details in general yet, because the competition is the same. With lenses, on the other hand, the fewer lenses, the better resolution they can provide and they don't have to correct as many defects, which are multiplied by the number of segments. This applies more to zoom lenses, not to fixed ones, and I'm not sure if plastic lenses from mobile phones are definitely sharpened at all, but they can't give such a picture as lenses for 10 or more thousand that allow full resolution of 12 or more MPX as well as set lenses for + - 5k for a DSLR simply won't show more than 10MPX, even if someone thinks it's great.
So the limits are basically two.
But it's quite possible that Apple kept a better lens for later to see the progress. For 6s and SE it is only for video.
I have a service and the speaker takes up a lot of space, if there should be 4, I don't know where they would fit.)))
I don't claim that there should be 4 speakers in the ip the size of the current speaker.. If apple wanted to put stereo speakers in the phone, it would certainly have to revise the current concept. Considering that he would not be the first to include stereo speakers in the phone, the technical solution is certainly successful.
If the Chinese can do it with the usual Alcatel/VDF Smart Platinum 7… why can't Apple, right? I will answer myself, because Apple has very well calculated profitability and tries to maximize profit at all costs...that's why the 16GB basic variant, that's why the stupid mono speaker, that's why it uses two generations of outdated IPS in the 6S and SE, even if it's well calibrated.
Unfortunately, that is the case.
The 6S has a different IPS than the SE. I don't see the two-generation backwardness anywhere, and the 4K resolution is not an argument, but nonsense. The second thing is who can supply Apple in the given quantity and quality.
4K is especially suitable for VR, FullHD or QHD is sufficient for normal use.
The nonsense is less than the HD resolution of the iPhone SE and roughly the HD resolution of the 6S, although I write that they are two generations behind the panels, but in fact three generations behind, technologically it is the same panel as in the iPhone 4S, it has the same parameters, the only difference that Apple had the SE panels produced by JDI (JDI happens to produce the best quality panels in the world, including the 4K one in the Z5P), it's still a technologically backward panel, compare it to the panel in the LG G3 and there's nothing to worry about.
The same idiots who complain today about how the terrible resolution on the SE and 6S is enough will complain after the next release about how the higher resolution is great... the same kind of idiots who said that a 5MP camera is enough, then they themselves complained that 8MPix is enough... pixels They are not an argument are they? :-) We'll talk about it in a few years, when you pull out the memories from the 16MP camera and view them on a 5K or rumored 8K iMac...and next to them 8Mpix photos or 12MPix. Even a million or two million pixels makes a huge difference in the quality of the captured details, otherwise, yes, it's just noise on social networks.
The only iPhone that can at least partially compare to the mid-range competition is the 6S Plus, but it costs more than twice as much as significantly better phones. :)
Choose the Z5 Premium, I've never heard a better quality front stereo speaker, plus IP68... The iPhone today is just average hardware at a completely overpriced price. The days of the iPhone 4S, which was at the cutting edge of technology, are long gone.
I know.. I'm staying with Apple only because of the system, I still can't come to the taste of Android, moreover, I still hope that Apple will return to the cutting edge of technology. Although it's more likely that cook will release another edition of a gay pride bracelet or emoticons with even more skin tones instead!
Z5 Premium is a great phone, simply top, 4K IPS display, enough power, great stereo, can be bought very cheaply, only a fool would pay Apple $849 for a 6S Plus, which has a production price of $210 and a sales value a few dollars higher.
And what exactly would it contribute to?