Vratislav Holub Apple finally unveiled the long-awaited iPhone 13 (Pro) today. This generation has traditionally been speculated on for several months, during which quite interesting information appeared. Arguably, the claims about the reduction of the top notch managed to garner the most attention. Apple is quite strongly criticized for the cut-out, and it was about time they did something about it. After four years with a notch (cutout), we finally got it - the iPhone 13 (Pro) really does offer a smaller cut-out.
Gallery
During the iPhone 13 (Pro) presentation itself, Apple did not miss the mentioned reduction. According to him, the components from the TrueDepth camera now fit into a 20% smaller space, thanks to which it was possible to reduce the size of the "notch". Although it sounds beautiful, let's look at it objectively. Already at first glance, it is obvious that a change has indeed occurred - not significant, but still better than in the case of previous generations. But if you were to really compare the images of the iPhone 12 and 13 in detail, you might notice one interesting thing. The upper cut-out of the "thirteen" just presented is considerably narrower, but it is also slightly higher.
Of course, it is necessary to realize one thing - the difference is absolutely minimal and will not affect the daily use of the phone. Unfortunately, in the current situation, the exact dimensions of the cutouts of this generation's Apple phones are not known, but according to the photos, it looks like the difference will not exceed more than 1 millimeter. So we will have to wait a little longer for more precise information.
It could be interest you
I asked here once before, but the comment somehow disappeared, so again - How can something be smaller and bigger at the same time?
The width is smaller and the height is larger. But the total content is smaller.
" Bottom line, the notch on the iPhone 13 (Pro) is both smaller and larger at the same time." - if the overall content is smaller, it is not smaller and larger at the same time.
The width is smaller, the height is larger. So it is smaller, but just change the point of view and it is suddenly bigger. I think that if you wanted to understand it, you definitely do :) but unfortunately you don't want to understand it.
It's all just because of the way you write about it here, i.e. your fabricated problem. You have to write it the same as it is stated on foreign websites. You got that information from them anyway. The neckline is smaller overall, but although it is significantly narrower, it is a little higher. It sounds much better than being smaller and bigger at the same time. Use some common sense and don't create unnecessary problems where there aren't any. This is not how you win the favor of apple growers.
So I edited the article, thanks for the comments. The title made sense to us when we were writing it. :)
Pavel: But I understand, I'm just pointing out that it's written in a complete moron. There is simply no such thing as smaller and larger at the same time, no matter how it is meant. It is simply narrower and taller.
All credit, it seems that the relationship between the readers of the site and the editors is starting to get a little better. Keep it up. If the editors will be a little sensible and those discussing the articles will write decently, then after a long time this could once again become the web home of apple lovers.