When there was speculation about the new version of the Mac operating system in the past months, among the most anticipated changes were major design changes. They also really arrived at Monday's WWDC, and OS X Yosemite received many changes modeled on the modern look of iOS.
Major design changes
At first glance, OS X Yosemite looks quite different from previous versions of the system, including the current Mavericks. Most of all, this difference is due to the inclination towards flatter and lighter surfaces in places like the top application bars.
Gone are the plastic gray surfaces from OS X 10.9, and there is no trace of the brushed metal from the early iterations of the decimal system. Instead, Yosemite brings a simple white surface that relies on partial transparency. However, there are no Windows Aero-style orgies, instead, the designers bet on the familiar style from mobile iOS 7 (and now also 8).
Gray comes back into play in the case of unmarked windows, which lose their transparency to better express their retreat behind the active window. This, on the other hand, has retained its distinctive shadow from previous versions, which also separates the active application very significantly. As can be seen, the bet on a flatter design does not necessarily mean a total departure from hints of plasticity.
The hand of Jony Ivo - or at least his team - can also be seen on the typographic part of the system. From the available materials, we can read a complete departure from the Lucida Grande font, which was ubiquitous in previous versions. Instead, we now only find the Helvetica Neue font across the entire system. Apple has obviously learned from its own errors and didn't use the extremely thin slices of Helvetica like iOS 7 did.
Dock
The aforementioned transparency "affected" not only open windows, but also another important part of the system - the dock. It abandons the flat appearance, where the application icons lay on an imaginary silver shelf. The Dock in Yosemite is now semi-transparent and reverts to vertical. A prominent feature of OS X thus arcs back to its ancient versions, which looked very similar except for the translucency.
The application icons themselves have also received a significant facelift, which are now less plastic and significantly more colorful, again following the example of iOS. They will share with the mobile system, in addition to a similar appearance, the fact that they will probably become the most controversial change of the new system. At least the comments so far about the "circus" look suggest so.
Controls
Another typical element of OS X that has undergone changes is the control "semaphore" in the upper left corner of each window. In addition to the mandatory flattening, the trio of buttons also underwent functional changes. While the red button is still used to close the window and the orange button to minimize, the green button has become a switch to full-screen mode.
The last part of the traffic light triptych was originally used to automatically shrink or enlarge the window according to its content, but in later versions of the system, this function stopped working reliably and became unnecessary. In contrast, the increasingly popular full-screen mode had to be turned on through the button in the opposite, right corner of the window, which was somewhat confusing. That's why Apple decided to unify all key window controls in one place in Yosemite.
The Californian company has also prepared an updated look for all other buttons, such as those found in the top panel of Finder or Mail or next to the address bar in Safari. Gone are the buttons embedded directly in the panel, they can now only be found in secondary dialogs. Instead, Yosemite relies on distinctive bright rectangular buttons with thin symbols, such as we know from Safari for iOS.
Basic application
The visual changes in OS X Yosemite are not only in the general level, Apple has transferred its new style to the built-in applications as well. Most of all, the emphasis on content and the reduction of redundant elements that do not carry any important function is noticeable. That is why most built-in applications do not have the application name at the top of the window. Instead, the most important control buttons are at the very top of the applications, and we find the label only in cases where it is critical for orientation - for example, the name of the current location in the Finder.
Apart from this rare case, Apple really prioritized informational value over clarity. This change is probably most noticeable in the Safari browser, whose top controls have been unified into a single panel. It now contains a trio of buttons for controlling the window, basic navigation elements such as navigation in history, sharing or opening new bookmarks, as well as an address bar.
Information such as the page name or the entire URL address is no longer visible at first glance and had to give priority to the largest possible space for content or perhaps also the visual intent of the designer. Only longer testing will show how much this information will be missing in real use or whether it will be possible to return it.
Dark mode
Another feature that highlights the content of our work with the computer is the newly announced "dark mode". This new option switches the main system environment as well as individual applications into a special mode designed to minimize user disruption. It is intended for times when you need to concentrate on work, and helps, among other things, by darkening the controls or turning off notifications.
Apple did not present this function in detail at the presentation, so we will have to wait for our own testing. It is also possible that this feature is not completely finished yet and will still undergo some changes and improvements until the autumn release.
"But there are no Windows Aero-style orgies" is that an obligatory kick to Windows? Has the author ever seen Aero? The only thing that is bad about Aero is that I can freely set the color of the environment as in every Windows. Otherwise, it's transparent window frames that Apple copied (that is, if someone didn't already have it before Windows :) plus some useful window gestures.
These are frog wars, it wouldn't be the same without the rivalry between the majority systems. Personally, I perceive the difference between OSX and Win in that in OSX I always look forward to a new version and in Win I dread it ;)
Yes Yes, I'm looking forward to OS X and WIN ... although the effort is appreciated
Yes, they are, that's why it bothers me so much in the article.
This mention is there to show that the semi-transparency in Yosemite doesn't even remotely resemble Windows, but more like iOS 7. If you remember Vista, working with it looked like messing around in a glass container.
It is possible, luckily in Windows you have the freedom to change the appearance.
I only own an ios device. Personally, I rather dread each new iOS version because there is no going back and everything is forced on me. On the other hand, I'm looking forward to Windows, because if I want I can return everything to "normal".
Apple copied aero? When? Aqua was introduced much earlier…
Well, I'm writing if someone didn't come up with it earlier :) However, it doesn't change anything about the first sentence of the post.
I was very pleased with OS X, it looks modern and airy. iOS 8, on the other hand, disappointed me a little, the introduced technologies are great, but I expected a change in appearance. Now iOS looks pretty bad compared to OS X…
pretty bad compared to OS X?:D are you kidding me?:D Are you telling me that you would like some significant changes to the appearance of iOS every year? :) Well, another one of those people who will never be satisfied :).
I'm happy that on windows 8 I can easily give myself the same look as on Windows 95 :) What annoys me the most is that ios doesn't at least have color themes.
Christ's foot, what does the phrase "looks modern and airy" mean? I would understand such an assessment for a work of art that does not have to have any functionality, but here I would judge that you will assess whether it works well or works badly
You have to understand that they spent a whole year to modify the trash can icon!!
I'm also very excited about the design of the os xa. The whole announcement pleased me, it's a development in the right direction, I'm looking forward to it, I'm doing well, it will be even more useful than before if people use more devices from Apple, which will attract more customers
I was pleased with the sms and calls via os x, without even picking up the phone, I really don't like writing sms on the phone and not everyone has imessages, and I'm not even talking about calls, excellent, I'm excited
Exactly. Calls and text messages on OS X made me very happy. I missed that there day after day. One could write iMessage from the computer, but as soon as the sms came, I still had to go for the mobile phone. And I also like the quick launch of the hotspot.
I also agree. Calls and SMS via computer are perfect and Kor with an unlimited tariff
even worse coloring pages than before... I don't understand the unification with iOs...
I'm sorry for being blunt, but Jony Ivo's handwriting is starting to piss me off. A person eventually gets used to everything, in the end it's just a colorful tool to launch the terminal, but why?
For example, I would gladly kick him for that idiotic attack on the hidden url
I don't want to see how it will look when someone has 6 or 10 windows open on the desktop. it will be difficult to switch between them and distinguish one from the other.
Aside from the fact that the dock now looks like a Windows application, I also notice some inconsistencies. The icons look as if the author does not know whether he wants to go the way of iOS 7 or the current system. Previously, the icons were better aligned on both systems and also nice - exceptional. That designer should stick to the design and not dabble in graphics.
Then, in OSX, there is a big divide between a maximized window and a fullscreen application. I wonder if the maximized fullscreen window will finally be considered a window again and not a desktop. When a person switches cmd-` between application windows, the window in fullscreen for that application is somehow forgotten.. The same with cmd-tab.
I miss Forstall more and more…..
So do I understand correctly that I will have to manually expand the window to the full size of the screen, because the green button will do the same atrocities as the button in the right corner? Oh no :(