Dan Pražák For a number of weeks or months before yesterday's conference, speculations circulated across the Internet that Apple would present a new generation of AirPods. In the end, the new wireless headphones from the Apple workshop did not show up, but even so yesterday, AirPods 2 appeared for a brief moment and together with them, the company also highlighted one of their main functions.
In the introductory video, which served as a kind of parody of Mission Impossible, the main actress used the voice command "Hey Siri" through AirPods. The virtual assistant then asked about the fastest way to the Steve Jobs Theater. However, the current generation of AirPods does not support the aforementioned voice command, and to activate Siri, you need to tap one of the headphones (unless another shortcut is selected in the settings).
This is what AirPods 2 should look like:
Gallery
The "Hey Siri" function has been speculated several times in connection with the new AirPods. Together with water resistance and support for wireless charging, it should be one of the main novelties of the second generation. So it's quite likely that Apple has AirPods 2 more or less ready. The reason for the delay is possible problems with the AirPower wireless charger, which the company introduced a year ago, but still she didn't start sell.
It is still possible that both AirPods 2 and AirPower will make their debut this year. Both products could be presented at the autumn conference, where the new iPad Pro with Face ID and a cheaper version of the MacBook as a successor to the MacBook Air should also be revealed. The news could go on sale before the Christmas shopping season. But whether this will actually be the case, we can only speculate for now.
AirPods' "Hey Siri" feature is used at 0:42:
Do you think the Russians should do it? That it is against the competition so huge, poorly made and playing. Or is that the aim so that the retard can be identified at 100 meters. Because you look like that.
I don't know who made you because you bark a lot here and if you're only half a retard than here you can be recognized from 200m away.
Since you didn't refute anything I wrote, I'm right and I was just kidding. You're obviously one of the retards that got me in my head and stuff in my ears. In addition, you have a weak vocabulary, try to come up with something of your own and with commas. And I'm not spoiling my sight with your path??
Thor Stein, wouldn't it be better to focus on football in your place. :-)
That's like if I recommend you a gym? Does it mainly need an overview?
Well, you didn't hit very well. I always wear headphones for sports and otherwise I have Marshalls. And that file at home. I don't walk on the street and I don't use public transport. And I really don't like those eggs in sails.
Just what about the article here, your negativistic bullshit in the discussion. So therefore.
This is only your personal point of view because it affects you personally. I call it constructive criticism and truth. Today, Apple is barely average, but it's a fact that they put above-average prices on it. AirPods are the hottest looking, the hottest playing and the hottest manufactured headphones in their category, it's simply a reality. Which I can prove. Then you're just rambling.
You didn't really shine with those Marshalls, if it was meant to be. Headset for businessmen. Personally, I think it has nothing to do with Marshall, it's just that some Chinese guy bought the rights to use the logo from them and is now putting it on cheap headphones. And they shot the place for three kilos for three liters because it's a Marshall isn't it?
I understand that it's negative for you, but that's how it is in reality. I'm just not fair. I personally use Audioquest and out Cardas. But you probably don't even know that?
I have Bang Olufsen as a wireless alternative, for the same money they are miles away from the flimsy-looking AirPods. Lip they play, look, are processed, equipped,…. that's the reality.